Experience The Dayton Difference

At Dayton Law, you will study under our nationally recognized curriculum. This program's challenging classroom dialogues and unique experiential learning opportunities will prepare you to be a lawyer who solves the real-world problems of individuals, families, organizations and your communities. You will acquire the legal knowledge, skills and values needed to help others and to distinguish yourself by making a true impact upon the world.

Our academic program gives you the choice of an Online Hybrid J.D. or a Residential J.D. along with opportunities to participate in special programs such as the Program in Law and Technology, the Pro Bono Commitment to Community Program, externships, clinics, Law Review, moot court and mock trial.

In addition to our J.D. program, we offer online graduate degrees in American and Transnational Law, including a Master of Laws (LL.M.) and a Master in the Study of Law (M.S.L.). We also offer a joint J.D./M.B.A. degree, a joint J.D./M.S. in Educational Administration degree, and a joint J.D./M.P.A. Master of Public Administration degree.

Our courses are taught by talented, dedicated, full-time faculty and a cadre of part-time faculty that includes respected judges and experienced practitioners. Before joining Dayton Law, our full-time faculty members were judicial clerks, public defenders, litigators and practicing attorneys in private firms, corporations and government agencies; some spent time working outside the legal profession in diverse fields.

You will find Dayton Law to be a place where you forge lifelong friendships with your classmates. A diverse community of bright, motivated people who genuinely care about one another and about their community is waiting to welcome you. We have student organizations to match every interest, from intellectual property law to entertainment law to constitutional issues.

As both a student and an alumnus, you will also benefit from an extremely supportive network of alumni who regularly serve as teachers and mentors. And Dayton Law is at the heart of the Greater Dayton legal community; judges, lawyers and other community leaders, many of whom are graduates of our School, are frequently on campus.

Our faculty, staff and students work hard to make the University of Dayton School of Law a collaborative community, where, we believe, you will find a warm, welcoming place. You will also discover that we are committed to inclusivity, service and justice inspired by our Catholic, Marianist heritage. Great lawyers do not just know their craft, they also do what is right. That is why we believe law is not just a job.

It is a calling.

If you have questions, please contact our Admissions Office to visit us and tour our beautiful facility, Joseph E. Keller Hall. 

Accreditation

Statement

The University of Dayton School of Law is approved by the Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar of the American Bar Association, 321 North Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654, 312-988-6738.

History

The School of Law was first established at the University of Dayton in 1922 and flourished for thirteen years. The law school was a leader in educating men and women in this region, many of whom became prominent lawyers and jurists. With the tumultuous times associated with the Great Depression, the School of Law closed in 1935.

Following several years of planning and preparation, the School of Law reopened in 1974. The school received provisional accreditation by the American Bar Association during its first year in operation, 1974-75. In 1979, the law school received full accreditation from the Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admission to the Bar of the American Bar Association. The School of Law also received membership in the Association of American Law Schools in 1984.

The University of Dayton is accredited by the North Central Association of Colleges and Secondary Schools, and many of its programs are accredited by various professional organizations.

Advisory Council

Michael Mutek '79 Chair
General Counsel, Defense
Aerojet Rocketdyne
Huntsville, AL

Linn Harson '96 Vice-Chair
Crown Equipment Corporation
Vice President & Chief Compliance Officer
New Bremen, OH

Richard Apostolik '77
President and Chief Executive Officer
Global Association of Risk Professionals
Jersey City, NJ

Stacey Brown '98
Chief Human Relations Officer
First Hospitality
Chicago, IL

James Byrd '84
Dayton, OH

Christine M. Haaker '91
Partner-In-Charge
Thompson Hine LLP
Dayton, OH

Martin Hamlette ‘02
Head of U.S. Environmental, Social And Governance (ESG) Strategy, Operations & Partnerships
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp
Washington DC

Gregory Harrison '85
Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP
Cincinnati, OH

Daniel Herling '79
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
and Popeo, P.C.
San Francisco, CA

D. Jeffrey Ireland '80
Faruki Ireland & Cox PLL
Dayton, OH 

Tami Kirby '04
Partner-In-Charge
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
Dayton, OH

Kermit Lowery ‘84
Dayton, OH

Becky McClennen ‘11
CityWide Development Corp.
Dayton, OH

John H. Muehlstein, Jr. '80
Pedersen & Houpt, P.C.
Chicago, IL  

Jeffrey A. Mullins '90
Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP
Dayton, OH

Greg Palmer
Dayton, OH

Honorable Walter H. Rice
Emeritus
U.S. District Court
Dayton, OH

Tejal Wadhwani ‘94
Managing Director & Associate General Counsel
Goldman Sachs
New York, NY

Merle Wilberding
Coolidge Wall
Dayton, OH

Mission Statement

Our mission as a law school reflects our character and purpose, derives from our traditions, and inspires our aspirations. Our mission and our vision have important implications for how law is taught here and how you can expect to be treated as a student.

As an integral part of the University of Dayton, a Catholic university founded by members of the Society of Mary in 1850, we share the University's commitment to serving others and offering an education that blends theory and practice. Like the University, we also highly value the role of faculty as teachers and mentors, as well as scholars.

Central to our curriculum and our teaching is the notion of developing complete professionals. The traditional approach to legal education prevalent at law schools across the country, centering upon the case method and legal reasoning, is augmented by development of the professional skills that our students will rely upon as practitioners and an enhanced appreciation for ethics and community service that will distinguish them as lawyers and leaders in the years ahead.

As a law school with a growing reputation, we are committed to developing and offering outstanding programs of study. We continually invest in those areas most important to the education of our students, our dedicated faculty, our innovative curriculum, and the physical environment in which our students' education takes place.


Our History

The School of Law is a part of the University of Dayton, which was founded in 1850 and is recognized as a top-tier national university and one of the 10 best Catholic universities in the nation. As a Catholic, Marianist institution, the University of Dayton is committed to producing graduates who uphold the highest professional standards.

First established as the University of Dayton College of Law, the School of Law opened in 1922 under the guidance of Dean John C. Shea, the former first assistant director of law for the City of Dayton. Reflecting the Catholic Marianist tradition of inclusivity and acceptance, the college’s first class was comprised of a diverse group of students, including two women and one African American.

From its founding, the School of Law was known for its focus on teaching and academic excellence. Every member of the first class passed the bar exam on the first attempt, with bar passage rates remaining extremely high for the next decade. Despite the success of its graduates, the economic turmoil of the Great Depression led the law school to close its doors in 1935 with the expectation of reopening when times improved.

Nearly four decades later, in September 1974, this expectation became a reality, and the school, renamed, the "University of Dayton School of Law" reopened. Since reopening, the School of Law has become known nationally for innovative programs like one of the nation's first online hybrid J.D. programs and its Leadership Honors Program.

Dayton Law believes in providing students with practical legal training through opportunities like its highly respected Legal Profession Program, its Human Rights and Hanley Sustainability collaboratives, classes formed in partnership with Copeland and LexisNexis, its Program In Law and Technology, and its externship course and law clinics.

The School of Law continues to be an innovative institution dedicated to preparing future lawyers with the legal knowledge, skills and values needed to help others and make a true impact upon the world.

List of Deans

Christopher Roederer (Interim) - 2025-present

Victoria VanZandt (Interim) - 2024-2025

Andrew Strauss (Emeritus) - 2015-2023

Paul McGreal - 2011-2015

Lisa Kloppenberg - 2001-2011

Francis Conte - 1987-2001

Dennis Turner (Interim) - 1986-1987

Frederick Davis - 1981-1986

Richard Braun - 1974-1980

Norman George (Interim) - 1973-1974, 1980-1981

Robert Patterson - 1930-1935

John Shea - 1922-1930



Learning Outcomes

Effective November 19, 2014

In accordance with ABA Standards, the University of Dayton School of Law has established the following desired learning outcomes, which identify the knowledge, skills, and values it desires its graduates to possess. The School of Law is constantly seeking to improve it students’ educational experience. Consistent with that goal, the School of Law engages in periodic measurement to evaluate the degree of student attainment of competency in these outcomes and to make appropriate changes to improve its curriculum.

Learning Outcome 1: Graduates will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the law and the American legal system.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1: Identifying, describing, and interpreting the fundamental terms, rules, and principles of law, including significant alternative formulations, such as minority rules.  

Criterion 2:  Describing the American legal system’s structures, processes, and procedures.

Learning Outcome 2: Graduates will exhibit issue-spotting skills.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1:  Identifying each potentially applicable legal theory as it relates to the facts.   

Criterion 2: Identifying each legal rule relevant to each potentially applicable legal theory.   

Criterion 3:  Identifying the legally significant facts relating to each applicable legal rule. 

Learning Outcome 3: Graduates will demonstrate competency in analytical, cognitive, and problem-solving skills.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1:  Identifying and critically reading the applicable legal authority, including identifying key rules within each authority.

Criterion 2:  Synthesizing the relevant rules of law into a logical framework for analysis. 

Criterion 3:  Where rules conflict, thoroughly analyzing which rule a court is likely to apply. Where applicable, understanding the logic and purpose behind each rule, so that the rule can be articulated correctly and applied coherently in difficult cases. 

Criterion 4:  Meticulously applying the identified rules to the facts, including evaluating potential counterarguments, to determine the likely outcome of the case.  

Criterion 5:  When appropriate, analogizing the facts to and distinguishing the facts from those of precedent cases in specific and helpful ways to determine the likely outcome of the case. 

Criterion 6:  Articulating practical considerations, such as cost and effects on other people.

-Revised (Fall) 2022

Learning Outcome 4: Graduates will communicate effectively and efficiently to individuals and groups.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1: Writing documents that are clear, concise, well-reasoned, organized, professional in tone, appropriate to the audience and the circumstances, and if appropriate, contain proper citation to authority.

Criterion 2: Speaking in a clear, concise, well-reasoned, organized, and professional manner that is appropriate to the audience and the circumstances.

Criterion 3:  Actively listening to clients, colleagues, judges, and others.

Learning Outcome 5: Graduates will research effectively and efficiently.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1: Devising and implementing a logical research plan.

Criterion 2: Identifying and effectively employing the fundamental tools of legal research.

Criterion 3: Accurately assessing the relevance and weight of authority.

-Revised (Fall) 2022

Learning Outcome 6: Graduates will demonstrate competency in legal practice skills.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1:  Capably managing a legal project (e.g., case, memorandum, mediation) from its inception to its conclusion.

Criterion 2:  Effectively planning and controlling their use of time.

Criterion 3:  Identifying and effectively engaging in negotiation and appropriate dispute resolution processes.

Criterion 4: Displaying effective interviewing and counseling skills, using empathy, respect, and self-awareness. 

Criterion 5: Effectively and ethically integrating technology in legal work whether in person, remote, or hybrid (e.g., case management, legal research, use of AI, etc.).  

-Revised December, 2024

Learning Outcome 7: Graduates will recognize and resolve ethical and other professional dilemmas.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1:  Listing the sources of the law governing lawyers.

Criterion 2:  Identifying and explaining the applicable law governing lawyers.

Criterion 3:  Using the law governing lawyers to recognize ethical and other professional dilemmas.

Criterion 4:  Applying the law governing lawyers to help resolve ethical and other professional dilemmas. 

Criterion 5:  Exercising professional judgment to help resolve ethical and other professional dilemmas.

Learning Outcome 8: Graduates will continue to develop professional skills and attributes.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1: Exhibiting self-directed learning skills to take initiative in their learning, elicit and incorporate feedback into their performance, and reflect on and revise strategies to enhance their skills and professional practice.  

Criterion 2:  Participating in extracurricular opportunities to increase knowledge, hone skills, and inform values.

Criterion 3: Identifying and implementing personal wellness strategies for managing stress, workload and professional responsibilities. 

Criterion 4: Engaging in academic and professional pursuits with integrity, honesty, and diligence.

Criterion 5: Completing tasks, assignments, and responsibilities with a high level of thoroughness, attention to detail, and commitment to excellence.

Criterion 6: Taking accountability for their actions and decisions, following through on commitments in a timely and reliable manner, and taking appropriate corrective action when mistakes are made.

-Revised December, 2024

Learning Outcome 9: Graduates will exemplify the Marianist charism of service, community, and inclusivity.

Graduates will demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome by . . . 

Criterion 1: Exhibiting professionalism and treating each individual with dignity and respect.

Criterion 2:  Displaying diversity skills, including sensitivity to social and cultural difference. 

Criterion 3:  Contributing to the profession's fulfillment of its responsibility to ensure that adequate legal services are provided to those who cannot afford to pay for them.

-Revised (Fall) 2022