Skip to main content


Andrea M. Seielstad

Professor of Law

Full-Time Faculty

School of Law


Email: Andrea Seielstad
Phone: 937-229-3801
6 Keller Hall


Professor Seielstad teaches clinical and doctrinal courses. In both kinds of courses, she integrates problem-solving exercises and applied lawyering skills, typically within the context of representing real clients. Through experiential learning opportunities, Professor Seielstad seeks to bring to life the contemporary relevance of theoretical concepts relevant to the courses she teachers as well as to allow students to develop other fundamental lawyering skills.

She engages students enrolled in clinical courses in developing an array of lawyering skills essential to assisting clients within low-income communities to respond effectively to legal proceedings they face and solve problems affecting themselves, their families and/or their communities. Wherever possible she engages students in impact litigation and in other forms of advocacy aimed at addressing systemic problems and injustices facing groups of marginalized people. “Representing individual clients who would not otherwise be able to have legal assistance is rewarding and important work, to be sure,” she says.  “Helping figure out creative solutions to widespread problems affecting whole communities or groups of people is especially imperative, given the great disparities that exist in most of our communities and the relatively few lawyers focused on making community and social change. If law students aren’t exposed to both the very real inequalities that exist in society as well as effective use of tools like litigation for challenging the status quo, how will our profession ever recognize our responsibility to ensure that our legal systems are fair to all and provide equal access to justice?”

In the Dayton area, Professor Seielstad has worked with students in promoting change in the areas of housing and homelessness, juvenile law and the conditions of confinement in local jails.   

Professor Seielstad's scholarly interests derive from ongoing reflections and experience as a practitioner-of-law with teaching and research interests. She has published in the Clinical Law Review a piece on the phenomenon of unwritten rules in local legal culture as well as an article setting forth a model of teaching problem solving in clinical legal education through collaborative community building activities with grassroots organizations. An article describing potential methods of using international norms to promote legal change within areas of U.S. domestic law traditionally governed by state and local law is forthcoming. Another aspect of her scholarship focuses on issues relevant to indigenous sovereignty and tribal court jurisdiction and jurisprudence. She published in the Tulsa Law Review a comprehensive and multifaceted analysis of the origins and evolution of the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity. She presents regularly at national and international conferences on topics relevant to clinical legal education, tribal justice systems, community lawyering, and social justice. She has also published a variety of amicus and appellate briefs before the Supreme Court, federal court and tribal court on the issue of individual rights and tribal sovereignty under the Indian Civil Rights Act.

Prior to teaching, Professor Seielstad practiced law as a staff attorney for DNA-People's Legal Services, Inc. in Crownpoint, New Mexico, representing members of the Navajo Nation before the Courts of the Navajo Nation, federal and state court, and administrative tribunals. She has taught also at the law schools of the Universities of New Mexico and Idaho, representing clients as a clinical teacher before the Courts of the Nez Perce Tribe. She is licensed to practice law in the Navajo Nation, New Mexico and Ohio. While in Dayton, she has been involved in a number of community-based professional activities, including the board of the Legal Aid Society of Dayton, the Volunteer Law Project, a regional task force on hate crimes, community mediation and problem-solving with inner-city communities, and The Other Place, an organization providing services and advocacy initiatives on behalf of the homeless

Courses Taught

LAW 6101 Civil Practice and Procedure
LAW 6200 ADR for the Lititgator
LAW 6950 Law Clinic Internship


J.D., University of Michigan, 1991
B.A., Princeton University, 1988

Areas of Law

Clinical Teaching
Community Lawyering
Federal Indian Law & Tribal Court Jurisprudence
Civil Procedure
Federal Jurisdiction

Significant Litigation and Amicus Briefs

United States Supreme Court

Amicus Curiae brief, Tavares v. Whitehouse, Brief of Andrea M. Seielstad, as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner, Tavares v. Whitehouse, 2017 WL 4857396 (October 23, 2017)(co-authored the brief with legal counsel, Gretchen Harris Sperry, Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, and served as primary amici), published and; 

Amicus Curiae brief, U.S. v. Bryant Amicus, March 14, 2016 (contributed to the drafting of the brief and served as named Amicus representative of the Tribal Defenders Network), published at 

Ninth Circuit  

Opening Merit and Reply Briefs of Appellant, Napoles v. Rogers, Case No.  17-16620 (January 15, 2018; June 6, 2018)(appealing dismissal of petition for writ of habeas corpus brought under the Indian Civil Rights Act)

Oral Argument, Napoles v. Rogers, Case No.  17-16620. scheduled for October 9, 2018, San Francisco

Federal District Court, E.D. California

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Napoles v. Rogers, Case 1:16-cv-01933-DAD-JLT, co-authored with co-counsel Jack Duran  (December 27, 2016)

First Amended Petition, Napoles v. Rogers, Case 1:16-cv-01933-DAD-JLT, co-authored with Jack Duran (January 29, 2017)

Opposition Brief, Motion to Dismiss by Bishop Paiute Tribal Council, Napoles v. Rogers, Case 1:16-cv-01933-DAD-JLT, (June 5, 2017), published at

Opposition Brief, Motion to Dismiss by Tribal Court Judge, Napoles v. Rogers, Case 1:16-cv-01933-DAD-JLT (June 5, 2017), published at

Bishop Paiute Tribal Court of Appeals

Opening Merit and Reply Briefs for Appellants, Bishop Paiute Tribal Council v. Napoles, BT-AP-2017-002, opening brief prepared in collaboration with Appellant, Ronald Napoles (September 13, 2017; December 29, 2017)

Supplemental Brief, Bishop Paiute Tribal Council v. Napoles, BT-AP-2017-002 (November 21, 2017)

Oral Argument by video-conference (January 29, 2018)

Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition (Emergency Action Required), Bishop Paiute Tribe Ex Rel., Napoles v. Kockenmeister, Chief Judge of Bishop Paiute Tribal Court, BP-CA-WRIT-2017-0001 (March 10, 2017)

Southern California Intertribal Court of Appeals

Opening Merit and Reply Briefs for Appellant, Bishop Paiute Tribal Council v. Bouch, prepared in collaboration with pro se Appellant, Ronald Napoles, B-AP-1412-6-12 (April 27, 2015; June 17, 2015)

Brief in Opposition to Motion for Rehearing, Bishop Paiute Tribal Council v. Bouch, B-AP-1412-6-12  (December 26, 2015)

Oral Arguments (September 29, 2015 & April 29, 2016), Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, California

Invited Presentations

Belonging and (Dis)memberment, 50 Years of the Indian Civil Rights Act:  Protection and Denial of the Civil Rights of Native Americans, A Symposium Presented by the Law and Indigenous Peoples Program and Tribal Law Journal, University of New Mexico School of Law, March 8 and 9, 2018 

Pre-trial detention and bail: Cruel and Unusual Punishment? Constitution/Pre-Law Day Symposium, Central State University, September 21, 2017 

Faculty Governance As A Means Of Ensuring University Compliance With EEO, Affirmative Action, And Title IX, Annual Conference, American Association of University Professors, Washington, D.C., June 9, 2015, presented with Rebecca Well, Professor, University of Dayton School of Business

The Promise of Virtual Worlds in Global Justice Education: Virtual worlds are emerging frontiers for experiential learning and the teaching of lawyering skills and perspectives. With proper training, planning and integration with other Web 2.0 platforms and traditional class-room methods, law clinics may make effective use of virtual worlds to augment real-world problem-solving and justice initiatives as well as to enhance student learning and reflection about issues of local as well as global concern.

Community Building and Problem Solving, Fifth International Conference on Clinical Legal Education: "Problem Solving in Clinical Education" sponsored by the UCLA School of Law and the University of London Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, Lake Arrowhead, California, November 2001. As panelist presented a paper on teaching and development of problem-solving skills through a model of clinical legal education that combines community lawyering with individual representation and collaborative community building activities.

Recognition and Enforcement of Individual Rights within the Navajo Nation, Navajo Nation Bar Association, Bar Preparatory Course, Window Rock, Arizona, March 2001.

The Culture of Justice, Association of American Law Schools (AALS) Annual Clinical Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, May, 2000. Discussed justice implications of local legal cultures, including their disproportionate impact in some places on different groups of people, and engaged participants in brainstorming session about strategies for changing the legal cultures in which they practice.

Moving from the Office to the Community, From the Individual to the Neighborhood: Implementing Community Lawyering into a Traditional Case-Based Clinical Program, A.A.L.S. Conference in Washington, D.C., January 2000. As presenter on Lawyering without Clients panel, discussed a model of integrating community-based advocacy into traditional individual client-based clinical programs, drawing from experiences with grassroots community development work in University of Dayton's clinical program.

Taking Sides in Community-Based Social Justice Advocacy: Comparative International Perspectives, Global Alliance for Justice Education (G.A.J.E.), First International Conference, Trivandrum, India, December 10, 2000. Delivered introductory presentation and facilitated discussion regarding the various roles lawyers and clinical programs may play in addressing systemic injustice in the communities and legal systems in which we work. Explored potential issues that can emerge when clinical programs allocate resources to certain community entities or interests, thereby altering the status quo and changing the allocation of power within communities. Co-presented with Professor Judith Dickson, LaTrobe University.

Tribal Adjudicatory Jurisdiction after the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in A-1 Contractors v. Strate, C.L.E. presentation delivered at Navajo Nation Bar Association's Annual Conference held in Flagstaff, Arizona in June 1999. Written materials distributed also at the State Bar of Arizona's annual conference in 1999.

Teaching Case and Project Management Skills, presentation delivered at Midwest Clinical Conference in Chicago, Illinois, October 1998. Co-presented with Professors Kimberly O'Leary and Kathy Hessler.

Selected Publications

The Recognition and Evolution of Tribal Sovereign Immunity under Federal Law: Legal, Historical, and Normative Reflections on a Fundamental Aspect of American Indian Sovereignty, 37 Tulsa Law Review 661 (2002).

Community Building as a means of Teaching Creative, Cooperative, and Complex Problem Solving in Clinical Legal Education, 8 Clinical L. Rev. 445 (2002).

Unwritten Laws and Customs, Local Legal Cultures, and Clinical Legal Education, 6 Clinical Law Review 127 (1999).